Canada Acrostic Poems

DDL 1865 - ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS .....

ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE HO response to the concerns of some colleagues about the presentation of the Bill S.1865

I read carefully the 'heartfelt speech of the association architects and computer engineering professions.

would like to respond briefly to your legitimate but unfounded concern. The

Bill 1865 that I presented together with other colleagues in the Senate has sought to rationalize an industry, we too often mortified by RR.DD. 11/02/29 nn. 274 and 275 who had reason to exist at a time when the sector was suited to scientific and technical knowledge at that time. Period in which it was built in Italy.

The term "small building" contained precisely in those RR.DD. which put a sort of limit to the work of surveyors, was probably sufficient for that period. But we are sure that the small building designed in the 29 is the same as we understand today? I think not.

The bill under debate this "sets clear limits so tying them to school and university education, but more importantly, the acquisition specific ability to operate accessible through their participation, with profit and final exam in training courses organized by professional groups in agreement with the universities and institutes of secondary education degree. "

Therefore your concern regarding interference in our own areas of operation is dispelled by the establishment of better specified below certain limits.

Article. 2 In fact, break the limits of its competence in areas of the national territory for seismic risk than those for whom the risk is not to addressing the problem of reinforced concrete. I remember that 29 was considered an experimental material and is now the norm.

add that the bill provides that " remain excluded from the expertise of surveyors and construction experts to the structural design and construction management of complex organic structures and solidly connected and engaged in a single static function and structural adjustment on property with upper airspace 5.000metri the cubes in a seismic zone. "

I believe that your concern about the safety of users of buildings can be made fugal fact, article 3 sharply delimits the powers of the surveyor and master builder, even though they have degree in urban planning, setting the limit for the drawing up of action plans for housing development to the land area of \u200b\u200bone hectare. Add after this that is no requirement for all members to participate profitably in the training course on the energy performance of buildings responding to the growing demand for such attention to the environment which rightly comes from many quarters, including including our own category.

This bill has the presumption of wanting to shed light on all those regulatory issues that for too long now remained buried in the shadow of regulations have become obsolete.

Set specific criteria, does not limit the field of operation of some, if anything, reduces the extent of any invasion of the field by professional contiguous.

That said, the act S.1865 is a bill that is amended, modified and malleable according to the needs of all professionals involved, however, always bearing in mind the rationalization and simplification of rules combined with maximum attention must be given to the safety and welfare of citizens.

So if you have suggestions for improvement are welcome and you can let me have in the Senate.

We are in the process of settlement of a law, the submission of a bill is just the first step, the process towards l’approvazione finale è lungo e – ribadisco – modificabile e migliorabile anche negli aspetti normativo-burocratici.